How could cross- curricular leaning potentially impact on Primary Education?
Emily Vaughan
Blog Task
How could cross- curricular leaning
potentially impact on primary education?
Children all learn in their own individual way. Cross
curricular learning impacts on the children’s relationships with one another
when doing activities or group work on a table or even as the whole class but
they can also learn from one another to mirror the real world. Progression
through teaching to 3 to 4 subjects planning and tracking progression will be
difficult but also essential to when it comes to teaching the topic within the
subject. Perkins, D (2009) in sessions teachers must be ensure learners are
clear what the learning expectations are and the time for skills and knowledge
development and a concluding performance for learners to digest what they have
learnt and what they will develop this in the next session. Power, (2002) suggests that ‘schools need to
embrace cross curricular learning and move away from reform that positions
subjects in ways that hark back to some imagined past , rather than forwards to
more globalised times.’ However this quote is debated on that people need to
accept that in an information world, knowledge itself will be beyond the
capacity of the human brain and that the important skills will be in evaluating
and applying knowledge. However Barnes, J (2011) argued ‘the variability
between us is surely humanklnd’s greatest resources. There is an immeasurable
variety of possible connection between neurons controlling our senses, memory,
physical and emotional responses but also an amount of wealth of possibilities
suggests that we each experience the world around is in a subtly different way.
Cross curricular approaches mirrors and maximise this valuable diversity’.
Donaldson, G (2015) however he points out that teachers
and schools ability to respond to the changing needs is taken back and
constrained but all together the current national curriculum and assessment
arrangements no longer meet the needs of the children and young people in
schools in Wales and for a new change are fundamental and powerful to make
changes to the curriculum. In recent days the new curriculum is all about
different thinking and the practices towards topics where as children would
participate and engage with one another. Radical changes to the curriculum will
be made such as health and well-being will be linked in with areas of learning
experience and not for primary schools in particular but to be a new change to
the curriculum.
It was argued that in the 1967’s learning should not be
divided into subjects such as Maths, English etc. Eisner (1996) blames this way
of thinking for a diminution of children’s knowledge towards the strategy. On
the other hand Piaget says that we never know how to put ourselves in the place
of children we do not enter into their ideas we lend them ours always following
own reasoning’s we heap up only follies and error in their head, this is
important with curriculum design’. By connecting you’re knowledge you learn
better in many ways but many argue that it unleashes the creative potential of
the individual children/child. Two theorists believed that interaction between
children was very important, they say ‘besides acquiring new knowledge the
emphasis in what they call project lessons is also on motivation and acquiring
practical knowledge and developing social learning.
The curriculum is an important purpose of education as
teachers follow by this structure but also it also requires a high level of skill
on all key areas within topic. A connected curriculum need not and should not
be exclude discrete subject teaching and stick to the one, head teachers need
to ensure that the principles of inclusion are built into thematic curriculum
planning and regularly monitored and lastly clear moral and social imperatives
information and influence innovatory curricula content and pedagogy. Good
practice means that children’s essential part of the process with respect to
decision making and involving one another in early stage of primary school
right through to comprehensive school. Schools need to be provided with advice
on strategies that assist in acknowledge and recognising areas of the
curriculum which needs strengthening.
According to James, O (2009) ‘young people are rarely out
of the news but rarely in it positively, endless stories of young people’s lack
of attention and motivation to attend school, yet the future of the planet,
depending on their learning needs.’
Reference List:
Barnes, J. (2011). Cross-curricular learning 3-14 (2nd ed.). Los
Angeles, [Calif.] ; London: SAGE. (Accessed: 13th November)
Barnes, J., and Shirley, I. (2007). Strangely familiar: cross
curricular and creative thinking in teacher education. (Accessed: 13th
November)
Burton, N and Brundrett, M (2005) Leading the Curriculum in
the Primary School, London. Sage. (Accessed: 15th November)
Bell, D and Ritchie, R (1999) Towards Effective Subject
Leadership in the Primary School, Buckingham: Open University Press. (Accessed:
15th November)
James, O (2009). Britain on the couch. (Accessed: 15th
November)
Perkins, D (2009). Making learning Whole: How Seven
Principles of Teaching can transform Education. San Francisco: Joseph Boss.
(Accessed: 15t November)
Comments
Post a Comment